1997 Jeep Icon vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Icon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Icon would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Jeep Icon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1997 Jeep Icon has manual transmission. 1997 Jeep Icon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Jeep Icon | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Icon | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2880 mm |
