1997 Jeep Icon vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Icon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Icon would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Icon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Jeep Icon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jeep Icon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1997 Jeep Icon has manual transmission. 1997 Jeep Icon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Jeep Icon | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Icon | Epica |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |
