1997 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1997 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Jeep Wrangler | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | Wrangler | Elan |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2140 mm |
