1997 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1997 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 245 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (280 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Jeep Wrangler | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Wrangler | 626 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1995 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2620 mm |
