1997 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 939 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus Extreme. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Wrangler | Extreme |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2420 mm |