1997 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 82 kg more than 1997 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Forester (186 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | Wrangler | Forester |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 74.9 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |