1997 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Proton |
| Model | Wrangler | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2464 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |
