1997 Kia Capital vs. 1990 Renault Clio

To start off, 1997 Kia Capital is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Kia Capital (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Kia Capital should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Kia Capital weights approximately 420 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Kia Capital (152 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1997 Kia Capital will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: