1997 Lada Niva vs. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lada Niva would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (327 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1997 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1997 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 1106 kg more than 1997 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chevrolet Silverado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (414 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Lada Niva. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Lada Niva. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado has automatic transmission and 1997 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 1997 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Lada Niva | 2013 Chevrolet Silverado | |
| Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
| Model | Niva | Silverado |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1690 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 414 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 2318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5847 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1875 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3645 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 98 L |
