1997 Lada Vaz vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Lada Vaz is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Lada Vaz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1997 Lada Vaz has manual transmission. 1997 Lada Vaz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Lada Vaz | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lada | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Vaz | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5736 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
