1997 Lancia Kappa vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1997 Lancia Kappa is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lancia Kappa (202 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 610 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lancia Kappa (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Lancia Kappa | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Kappa | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1997 | 1967 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |