1997 Lancia Kappa vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lancia Kappa (202 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 740 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lancia Kappa (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Lancia Kappa | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Kappa | 3 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |