1997 Lexus LS vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2002 Renault Megane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lexus LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lexus LS would be higher. At 3,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lexus LS (280 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Lexus LS weights approximately 580 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lexus LS (398 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1997 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 1997 Lexus LS has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Lexus LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Lexus LS | 2002 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Lexus | Renault |
| Model | LS | Megane |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3967 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 398 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 17.5 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 60 L |
