1997 Lotec Testa de Oro vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro (741 HP) has 381 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Lotec Testa de Oro | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Lotec | Holden |
Model | Testa de Oro | Commodore |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5976 cc |
Horse Power | 741 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 900 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |