1997 Lotus Elise vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lotus Elise. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lotus Elise would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lotus Elise (117 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1997 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Lotus Elise | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Lotus | Ford |
| Model | Elise | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2490 mm |
