1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Mahindra Armada is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1997 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 830 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mahindra Armada | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Triumph |
| Model | Armada | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4420 mm |
