1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1997 Mahindra Armada is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (79 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1997 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1997 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mahindra Armada | 1990 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mahindra | Renault |
| Model | Armada | Clio |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1990 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3710 mm |
