1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 2002 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Toyota Celica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Celica (129 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1997 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1997 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 860 kg more than 2002 Toyota Celica.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mahindra Armada | 2002 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1832 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4340 mm |
