1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1997 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1997 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 280 kg more than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1997 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mahindra Armada | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Tundra |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5530 mm |