1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 825 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1997 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mahindra Armada | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mahindra | Renault |
Model | Armada | Clio |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3990 mm |