1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mahindra Armada | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mahindra | Renault |
Model | Armada | Clio |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3780 mm |