1997 Mahindra Armada vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 500 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mahindra Armada | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mahindra | Mitsubishi |
Model | Armada | Colt |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3640 mm |