1997 Maserati Shamal vs. 2006 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2006 Holden Caprice is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Maserati Shamal (321 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Caprice.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Maserati Shamal (444 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 1997 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Caprice. 2006 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1997 Maserati Shamal has manual transmission. 1997 Maserati Shamal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: