1997 Maserati Shamal vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Maserati Shamal (321 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Maserati Shamal (444 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1997 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Maserati Shamal | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Maserati | Holden |
Model | Shamal | Commodore |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3217 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 444 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |