1997 Mazda 323 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Mazda 323 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda 323 (142 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda 323 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda 323 (180 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda 323 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 323 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |