1997 Mazda 626 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Mazda 626 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda 626 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda 626. (145 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda 626 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 626 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
