1997 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Rover 75

To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1997 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 184 kg more than 1997 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda 626. (145 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Mazda 626 2004 Rover 75
Make Mazda Rover
Model 626 75
Year Released 1997 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 1374 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2750 mm