1997 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1997 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda 626 weights approximately 746 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda 626 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Westfield |
| Model | 626 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
