1997 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (185 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1997 Mazda 626. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1997 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC90 (340 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda 626. (151 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda 626 | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 151 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2860 mm |