1997 Mazda Midge vs. 1965 Skoda 1202

To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1965 Skoda 1202. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1965 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 139 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge.

Because 1965 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Skoda 1202.

Compare all specifications: