1997 Mazda Midge vs. 1978 Zastava 750

To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 750. (30 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda Midge weights approximately 324 kg more than 1978 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: