1997 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Toyota Sienna

To start off, 2010 Toyota Sienna is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sienna (266 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 944 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Sienna (332 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge. 2010 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1997 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1997 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: