1997 Mazda Midge vs. 2012 Chrysler Delta
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Delta is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler Delta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler Delta (163 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Delta should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chrysler Delta weights approximately 464 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chrysler Delta (360 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chrysler Delta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda Midge | 2012 Chrysler Delta | |
Make | Mazda | Chrysler |
Model | Midge | Delta |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |