1997 Mazda Midge vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 514 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1997 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1997 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: