1997 Mazda MPV vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Mazda MPV is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda MPV (146 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda MPV weights approximately 236 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda MPV. (228 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda MPV | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | MPV | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2954 cc | 4343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1486 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2750 mm |
