1997 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1997 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda RX-7 | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-7 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2860 mm |