1997 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda RX-7 (197 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda RX-7. (271 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda RX-7. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1997 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1997 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: