1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rover P5 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1962 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1962 Rover P5 has manual transmission. 1962 Rover P5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda SW-X | 1962 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | SW-X | P5 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1720 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
