1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 557 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda SW-X | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercury |
| Model | SW-X | Comet |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1662 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2950 mm |
