1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 1972 Triumph 1500
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 1500 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda SW-X weights approximately 140 kg more than 1972 Triumph 1500.
Because 1972 Triumph 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Triumph 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda SW-X | 1972 Triumph 1500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | SW-X | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 965 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |
