1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 375 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda SW-X | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | SW-X | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1480 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |