1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda SW-X weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda SW-X | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | SW-X | Smart |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |
