1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda SW-X | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | SW-X | C70 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1565 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |
