1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 120 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 2009 Mercedes-Benz C has manual transmission. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda SW-X | 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | SW-X | C |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1225 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |
