1997 Mazda SW-X vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda SW-X weights approximately 40 kg more than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2011 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mazda SW-X | 2011 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | SW-X | Equator |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |