1997 Mazda Xedos 9 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 (165 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 (212 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 has manual transmission. 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Xedos 9 | Cube |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 212 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 82 L |
