1997 MCC Smart vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | MCC | Talbot |
| Model | Smart | Baby |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
