1997 MCC Smart vs. 1960 MG MGA
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG MGA would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 MG MGA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 MG MGA (71 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 MG MGA should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 MG MGA weights approximately 250 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1960 MG MGA | |
| Make | MCC | MG |
| Model | Smart | MGA |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 71 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
