1997 MCC Smart vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 948 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Triumph Herald is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Triumph Herald weights approximately 110 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Smart | Herald |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 35 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
