1997 MCC Smart vs. 1960 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 746 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 ZAZ Jalta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. (23 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 MCC Smart weights approximately 50 kg more than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1960 ZAZ Jalta | |
| Make | MCC | ZAZ |
| Model | Smart | Jalta |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 23 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
